BlogsClash.com

Blank media allows people to record programming off the television or video they make themselves. It also allows people to burn pre-recorded programming to which they own the rights – particularly, all those movies. However, while in theory it is perfectly legal to copy content which you have purchased, the law also makes the technical ability to do so a crime subject to financial penalty and actual imprisonment – both.

Highly speaking, each and every blank media DVD has its own unique characteristic. For instance, a dual layer DVD has the ability to store double the amount of data than regular blank DVDs and can be bought in larger bundles whereas a blue ray blank DVD will have its energy to increase the quality of movies as well as present the full results of blue ray movies(1080p as well). Other than that, the copyright laws limit movies or shows to be copied, catch-22?

So what is one to do with all the blank media, then? Good query. Sadly, no one has the deep pouches of the movie studios and so the problem is never really completed in the courts (there appears to have been out-of-court pay outs, to be sure, but these never touch on the policy in place). Normally speaking, the court has acknowledged that not having the means for something that is a right is to de facto reject the right. This is why, for instance, school desegregation came about: having the right to appropriate schooling is incomprehensible when no proper schools exist.

So by the same token, if anyone had the income to go head-to-head with the movie studios all the way to the United States Supreme Court, it is imaginable that the judicial system will eliminate the onerous laws currently in place which eliminate consumers from legitimately backing up their property – property which the laws understands they have a right to make replicates of but which the laws also prevent from actually happening by barring the technology needed!

A small sliver of hope does occur, nonetheless, short of a remarkable court battle. The studios themselves have now recognized that the consumer is in the proverbial driver’s seat more than ever before. DVD has been a marketing success story that they fear may well never be repeated. High-speed broadband and on-demand programming may render their copyright protection schemes irrelevant, while assuring consumers anytime-anywhere access to content for which they have paid. Advances in technology will make irrelevant the whole controversy. It’s just a matter of time.

Right now, however, the United States is sorely lacking in connectivity. Americans pay more for less compared to citizens in many other advanced countries. Reliable broadband is still a luxury in many parts of the land, while on-demand programming is quite limited and nowhere near fulfilling its potential. But at least the movie studios understand that focusing on intellectual property is no longer just a simple matter of inconveniencing law-abiding consumers!